本人写SCI半年有余，读了很多经验贴，收获不小，附件是我投稿期刊的写作建议，感慨颇多，拿来与大家分享。第一次就是没看见这个PDF，编辑退回来修改时专门指出让我看的，读完是在感觉太精辟了。
摘几句话与大家分享：
1.claiming that a new theory or model is ‘good’ or ‘successful’ is unconvincing, but providing evidence that allows a sceptical reader to evaluate the theory, is valuable.
2. the introduction should motivate the reader to read the rest of the paper and demonstrate why the ensuing structure is logical; the first paragraph of each section should motivate the reader to read the section, and should present a clear structure for the information contained in it; the first sentence of each paragraph should motivate and structure the rest of the paragraph. First paragraphs and first sentences generally do not include references as their purpose is to give structure for the reader, not to present new information. Each paragraph should have a single purpose。
3. References in papers work best when the reference is used as the subject of a verb. For example “Smith (2004) analysed 14 companies manufacturing light
bulbs in Norwich and found that 12 of them failed basic Health and Safety requirements at least once per year” as opposed to “Safety is a concern in light bulb manufacture (Smith, 2004).” It is of almost no value to quote references in a list – precisely because this fails to give any indication of what each of the authors did, and how their conclusions differ。
不一而足。希望能对大家写作有所帮助
