华中科技大学 2009年招收博士研究生入学考试试题 {j!jm5
'@WpJ{]A
[table=419.4pt][tr][td=1,1,699]Part I Cloze (0.5x20=10%) yt@;yd:OEk
Directions: In this part you are asked to choose the best word for each blank in the passage. Write your answers on the answer sheet. =rB=! ;
The teacher of reading is involved, whether this is consciously realized or not, in the development of a literate society. And every teacher, 1 , needs to determine what level of literacy is 2 by society, what role he or she should take in 3 the desired standard of literacy, and what the implications of literacy are in a world context. 0?0$6F
The Unesco report presents a world 4 of literacy. Too often we limit our thoughts to the 5 small proportion of illiterates in our own country and fail to see it in its international 6 . P>wDr`*
The problems 7 developing nations are also facing industrialized nations. Literacy, as the report points out, is ‘inextricably intertwined with other aspects of national development… (and) … national development as a whole is bound 8 with the world context’. Literacy is not a by-product of social and economical development – it is a 9 of that development. Literacy can help people to function more effectively in a changing 10 and ideally will enable the individual to change the environment so that it functions more effectively. ,e{|[k
Literacy progammes 11 in different countries have taken and are taking different 12 to the problem: for example the involvement of voluntary non-governmental organizations, which 13 the importance of seeing literacy not as a condition imposed on people but as a consequence of active participation 14 society. People can learn from the attempts of other countries to provide as 15 ‘literacy environment’. NF0=t}e
Who are the ‘illiterates’ and how do we define them? At what point do we decide that illiteracy ends and literacy begins? Robert Hillerich 16 these questions. An illiterate, he finds, ‘may mean anything from one who has no formal schooling to one who has attended four years or less, to one who is unable to read or write at the level necessary to 17 successfully in his social position.’ Literacy, he points out, is not something one either has or has not got: ‘Any definition of literacy must recognize this quality as a continuum, representing all 18 of development.’ GcpAj9
An educational definition – i.e. in terms of grades completed or skills mastered – is shown to be inadequate in 19 educationally defined mastery may bear only minimal relation to the language proficiency needed in coping with environmental demands. From a sociological / economic viewpoint the literacy needs of individuals vary greatly, and any definition must recognize the needs of the individual to engage effectively and to act 20 responsible participation. %_>+K;<
Such a broadened definition excludes assessment based on a ‘reading-level type’; assessment must, rather, be flexible to fit both purpose and population. XoZw8cY
1. A. therefore B. in addition C. however D. nevertheless ="<S1}.
2. A. asked B. known C. demanded D. obtained 1vG]-T3VC
3. A. achieving B. getting C. fulfilling D. accomplishing
YO3$I!(
4. A. opinion B. idea C. point D. view ]JUb;B;Z
5. A. relatively B. particularly C. possibly D. definitely f]*_]J/
6. A. situation B. context C. environment D. atmosphere KXS{@/"-B
7. A. facing B. confronting C. encountering D. meeting j0
]|$p
8. A. to B. in C. up D. across VZRM=;V
9. A. component B. element C. ingredient D. factor <.l$jW]
10. A. tendency B. environment C. inclination D. development )HFl 0[vT
11. A. instituted B. rooted C. deprived D. revealed WL6p+sN'
12. A. ways B. methods C. approaches D. means F:P&hK
13. A. underlines B. indicates C. implies D. understates } XJZw|n
14. A. into B. within C. in D. inside Q~L"Mr8>V
15. A. adequate B. abundant C. over D. plenty j+E[[
16. A. demands B. addresses C. remains D. maintains -H;%1y$A-
17. A. perform B. do C. participate D. anticipate ,Z"l3~0\
18. A. extents B. forms C. degrees D. standards u3Jsu=Nx-
19. A. that B. what C. which D. such - A\J:2a|
20. A. in B. for C. against D. with u{@b_75Y
DW,fh8 w
Part II. Reading comprehension (20x2=40%) Lh M{d
Directions: There are four passages in this part. After each passage, there are five questions. You are to choose the best answer for each question. Write your answers on the answer sheet. }: W6Bo-|
Passage One OcBn1k.
In the competitive model ---- the economy of many sellers each with a small share of the total market ---- the restraint on the private exercise of economic power was provided by other firms on the same side of the market. It was the eagerness of competitors to sell, not the complaints of buyers, that saved the latter from spoliation. It was assumed, no doubt accurately, that the nineteenth-century textile manufacturer who overcharged for his product would promptly lose his market to another manufacturer who did not. If all manufacturers found themselves in a position where they could exploit a strong demand, and mark up their prices accordingly, there would soon be an inflow of new competitors. The resulting increase in supply would bring prices and profits back to normal. Hsoe?kUHF
As with the seller who was tempted to use his economic power against the customer, so with the buyer who was tempted to use it against his labor or suppliers, the man who paid less than the prevailing wage would lose his lab or force to those who paid the worker his full (marginal) contribution to the earnings of the firm. In all cases the incentive to socially desirable behavior was provided by the competitor. It was to the same side of the market ---- the restraint of sellers by other sellers and of buyers by other buyers, in other words to competition ---- that economists came to look for the self-regulatory mechanisms of the economy. 1HBdIWhHv.
They also came to look to competition exclusively and in formal; theory still do. The notion that there might be another regulatory mechanism in the economy had been almost completely excluded from economic thought. Thus, with the widespread disappearance of competition in its classical from and its replacement by the small group of firms if not in overt, at least in conventional or tacit, collusion, it was easy to suppose that since competition had disappeared, all effective restraint on private power had disappeared. Indeed, this conclusion was all but inevitable if no search was made for other restraints, and so complete was the preoccupation with competition that none was made. e?&4;
In fact, new restraints on private power did appear to replace competition. They were nurtured by the same process of concentration which impaired or destroyed competition. But they appeared not on the same side of the market but on the opposite side, not with competitors but with customers or suppliers. It will be convenient to have a name for this counterpart of competition and I shall call it countervailing power. h2Pvj37
To begin with a broad and somewhat too dogmatically stated proposition, private economic power is held in check by the countervailing power of those who are subject to it. The first begets the second. The long trend toward concentration of industrial enterprise in the hands of a relatively few firms has brought into existence not only strong sellers, as economists have supposed, but also strong buyers, a fact they have failed to see. The two develop together, not in precise step, but in such manner that there can be no doubt that the one is in response to the other. p4|Zz:f
21. The word “spoliation” in the first paragraph probably means ____. ON$^_l/c
A. loot Xu1tN9:oE
B. spoil 9J$z/j;X
C. restraint oXR%A7
D. agitation IX /r
22. How is economic power applied when a manufacturer wants to hire more workers? FL5tIfV+
A. He offers them welfare funds. );$L#XpB
B. He pays them according to their work. GUe&WW:Sqk
C. He provides free board and lodging. XZaei\rUn)
D. He gives them chances of getting promoted. y`~[R7E
l6X\.oI
23. Economists didn’t search for other restraints other than competition because ____. ~6nq$( #
A. they solely focused on competition S*o%#ZJN
B. they had no idea of other restraints N[~"X**x
C. they had more interest in competition /&>6#3df-
D. other restraints were of little importance K4vl#*qn
(~r"N?`
24. What does the author think of other economists’ prediction about the outcomes of concentration? pP&TFy#G+'
A. They have made wild predictions. ( _ZOUMe
B. They failed to see the rise of merger. xQ
`>
\f
C. They foresaw the appearance of strong buyers. iBy:HH
D. Their supposition was partially true. *8zn\No<,
7P`|wNq
25. The passage mainly discusses about ____. i;
1aobG
A. business Ly?gpOqu5
B. buyers and sellers 9=D\xBd|w
C. business model s@sr.'yU
D. economic power fA
u^%jiU
aC
lXg-
Passage Two 5FJ<y"<6
With few exceptions, the last words of history’s great players have been about as interesting and uplifting as a phone book. We may expect pearls of profundity from our expiring artists, philosophers, and world leaders, but more often we are left with dry-as-dust cliché. [YY[E 7
Admittedly, it’s not exactly fair to expect deep insights into life’s mysteries when the dying clearly have other things on their minds ---- hell, for instance, or unspeakable pain. Bullet-riddled Francisco “Pancho” Villa was probably preoccupied when he told a comrade, “Don’t let it end this way. Tell them I said something.” But don’t we have the right to expect eloquence in the final stanzas of legendary wordsmiths like Lord Byron and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe? Byron couldn’t be bothered to work up a decent rhyme: “Now I shall go to sleep. Good night.” Goethe’s last word were so dull biographers have been obliged to edit creatively; “Open the second shutter so that more light may come in” became the more sublime “More light!” (There is, by the way, some debate whether Goethe’s last words were not, in fact, “Come my little one, and give me your paw.”) 1&~u:RUXe
And one is loath to mention Whitman’s last barbaric yawp: “Hold me up; I want to shit.” Legendary wag Oscar Wilde’s last words were nothing more than shop talk. Commenting on a novel he had recently read, Wilde said, “This is a fine study of the American politician and possesses the quality of truth in characterization. What else has the lady written?” I| qoH N,g
Queens have left little more for the living to chew on. Elizabeth I was whiny (“All my possessions for a moment of time”), while Marie Antoinette was clumsy but polite: “Pardonnez-moi, Monsieur,” she said, after treading upon her executioner’s toe. uI7 d?s
Ironically, it may have been the relatively obscure who delivered history’s best exit lines. Has anyone departed the scene better than minor English playwright Henry Arthur Jones, who, asked whom he would prefer to sit with him during the evening, his nurse or his niece, replied, “The prettier. Now fight for it.” Actor Edmund Gwenn was terse: “Dying is easy. Comedy is difficult.” And you have to admire the singleness of purpose in the last words of French grammarian Dominique Bouhours: “I am about to ---- or I am going to ---- die; either expression is used.” For sheer entertainment value, you can’t beat the last words of condemned prisoners, particularly if you have a fondness for graveyard humor. Asked by the firing squad commander if he had a last request, James Roges said, “Why yes. A bullet-proof vest!” and you’ve got to love a condemned murderer who can continue to cut up from the electric chair. “How about this for a headline in tomorrow’s paper,” James French said. “French Fries!” YFD'&N,sx
Some last words will forever remain an enigma, their meaning gone to the grave along with their speakers. Henry David Thoreau’s “Moose, Indian,” for instance, and the eerie last words of John Wilkes Booth as he emerged from a burning barn, fatally wounded, looked at his hands and muttered, “Useless, useless.” In a similar vein, what to make of conductor Leonard Bernstain’s last words “What’s this?” or novelist Victor Hugo’s “I see black light”? 3jIi$X06
To me, the most genuine last words are those that arise naturally from the moment, such as Voltaire’s response to a request that he forswear Satan: “This is no time to make new enemies.” Compare that to the stagy, obviously rehearsed “Now comes the mystery” (Henry Ward Beecher) or Ludwig van Beethoven’s “Friends, applaud. The comedy is over.” Kd8V,teH
It may well be that planning your last words is no more profitable a pursuit than preparing our Novel Prize acceptance speech. Who can say when the Grim Reaper will tap a bony finger on your shoulder? It is unlikely that poet Dylan Thomas thought “I’ve had 18 straight whiskeys. I think that’s the record” was going to be swan song. [Y
_6PR
Could it be that “great last words” are a myth of the hale and hearty, and that the expiring understand that the deathbed is no place for 11th-hou philosophizing? Didn’t Christ himself sign off with the unpretentious “It is finished”? Besides, why should the mundane act of dying bring one any closer to the truth? Karl Marx may have had it right, for once, when he answered his housekeeper’s request for last words with: “Go on, get out! Last words are for fools who haven’t said enough!” SF2A?L?}+
26. The author’s attitude towards famous last words is ____. P 8DY*B k
A. sympathetic B. satirical C. callous D. incensed woJO0hHR
M7&u_Cn?
27. According to the author, when Francisco “Pancho” Villa gave his last words, he ____. 5
T1M:~u i
A. might be thinking of something else L;=:OX0
B. tried to make them more eloquent jW5n^Y)
C. wanted to tell a secret to a comrade PDaHY
D. was unwilling to die at an early age [
$_d|Z
+U9Gj#
28. The author takes Byron, Goethe and Wilde as examples to show that ____. 4:-h\%
A. biographers usually revise the last words of the great writers 8Czy<}S<G
B. just like average people, the dying wordsmiths have a confused mind 2mAXBqdm
C. it is disappointing that they failed to leave some memorable words 7q*L-Xe]k
D. it poses a great contrast between their works and last words pIdJ+gu(s
@BWroNg{
29. According to the author, the last words of ____ were comparatively good. s0"S;{_#
A. Edmund Gwenn B. Walt Whitman C. Henry David Thoreau D. Marie Antoinette kRs(A~ngc
_y&m4V