2015吉林大学考博英语真题阅读理解精练 Jon3ywd1Y
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the J s33S)
United States by applying new social research findings on the g}6M+QNj
experiences of European migrants. In his reinterpretation, migration "}0QxogYE
becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of G?~Yw'R^8
preindustrial North America. His approach rests on four separate 7^.g\Kt?
propositions. =saRh)EM
The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England J7WNgl%
u
moved regularly about their countryside; migrating to the New World
m5J@kE%
was simply a “natural spillover”. Although at first the colonies Ug#B
( }/
held little positive attraction for the English — they would rather 'g<FL`iP
have stayed home — by the eighteenth century people increasingly Y2uy@j*N
migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of 2S@Cj{R(
opportunity. Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that =`MQKh,
used to flourish in America history textbooks, there was never a DM)Re~*
typical New World community. For example, the economic and Q'e[(^8
demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably. H%>cpwa[7
Bailyn’s third proposition suggest two general patterns 9,>c;7s X
prevailing among the many thousands of migrants: one group came as ?ODBW/{[G
indentured servants, another came to acquire land. Surprisingly, bV)h\:oC
Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the cE,,9M@^
driving forces of transatlantic migration. These colonial R6o07.]
entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who <&1hJ)O
came to preindustrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled ?[5_/0L,=
`9f7H
laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers )Y1+F,C
demanded skilled artisans.
(H|^Ow5
Finally, Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized !*k'3rKOW
hinterland of the European culture system. He is undoubtedly correct kI*f}3)Y
to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo-American empire. %LL?' &&
But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, )4w3$Q
as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is >hotkMX `3
true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never i[e-dT:*R
matched that in England. But what of seventeenth-century New England, ?+{qmqN
where the settlers created effective laws, built a distinguished }Mc&yjhMrg
university, and published books? Bailyn might respond that New u&Xn#fh
England was exceptional. However, the ideas and institutions wqQrby<
developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North 9aKCO4
American culture. EhIa31>X
Although Bailyn goes on to apply his approach to some thousands n#5 pd;!n
of indentured servants who migrated just prior to the revolution, he W^9=z~-h
fails to link their experience with the political development of the 3q (]Dg;v
United States. Evidence presented in his work suggests how we might rEsGf+4
make such a connection. These indentured servants were treated as q9m-d-!)
slaves for the period during which they had sold their time to American URxy*)
employers. It is not surprising that as soon as they served their time ddeH-Z
they passed up good wages in the cities and headed west to ensure their F!6;<!&