一.名词解释 I`KBj6n
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. jx-
8%dxtZ
注册资本 -z?O^:e#x
二.论述题 >v
k?wY^f
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 eSA%:Is.
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 Ku<_N]9
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 E?^A+)<"
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 I3D# wXW
三.案例题(中文回答) 1`@rA A>h'
INTRODUCTION jY8u1z
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must o ](nK5?
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles *N?y <U
of international trade law to support your argument K)n0?
Q_>
"Qxn}$6-
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American "K$
y(}
C
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD ^"\., Y
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese (!&g (l;
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market > [|SF%
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed 9,;+B 8-A
back an acceptance. i WNTI
q{t"=@lX01
Questions: .1C|J
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per |Zo_x} 0
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? % 1p4K)
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese pd{;`EW|
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? @5# RGM)5^
o )
FjWf;
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B l C|{{?m
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity WPM< Qv L
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between K!9rH>`\
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked *X^__PS]
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter fV.43 E
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. rHtT>UE=
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on ZN ?P4#Z S
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the wzMWuA4vX
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was cF[[_
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a V6d*O`
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of XfxNyZsy&>
China and international practice I$`Vw >
>~$ S!
Questions: Iq\sf-1E
1)What is the main issue in this case? <][| ,9mw
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve t
MB;GIb #
the dispute?
