一.名词解释 *?K` T^LS
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. EL}v>s C
注册资本 iT5H<uS
二.论述题 ok6e=c '
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 ~ml\|
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 8OFrW.>[
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 \clWrK
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 #[[p/nAy}A
三.案例题(中文回答) vy#c(:UQR
INTRODUCTION GUp51*#XR
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must ^@19cU?q
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles \!^o<$s.G
of international trade law to support your argument ffB]4
yv:NH|,/y
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American < Ihn1?
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD \) #3S $L~
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese 5:PZ=jPR
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market n => Gu9`
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed l|fd,
back an acceptance. uB^]5sqfk
y(S0
2v>l
Questions: iB,*X[}EqG
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per e=R}
4`
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? wS^-o
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese DVS7N_cx2o
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? 8xv\Zj +
i :$g1
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B PaZYs~EO
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity 4HHf3j!5
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between qXF"1f_+
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked W!(Q_B
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter *o#`l H
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. \*N1i`99
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on 5jLDe~
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the #n7{ 3)
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was Cf N; `
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a gn%"dfm
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of `otQ'e~+t
China and international practice AK!G#u g
O`=Uq0Vv
Questions: 8xX{y#
1)What is the main issue in this case? a=O !\J
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve \2`U$3Q
the dispute?
