南京大学1996-2000国际经济法试题

一.名词解释 GwWK'F'2  
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. [9E~=A
#  
注册资本 G?Et$r7:R  
二.论述题 LKN7Lkl  
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 4P{| H  
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 #*A'<Zm  
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 pyEQb#  
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 VFE@qX|  
三.案例题(中文回答) F
`=p/IAJK  
INTRODUCTION kUBE+a6#  
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must m:BzIcW<\  
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles M1jT+  
of international trade law to support your argument aIgexi,  
+'F;\E  
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American ^}  {r@F  
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD VuLb9Kn  
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese n%Oi~7>  
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market SQMl5d1d:  
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed YNr5*P1  
back an acceptance. a\sK{`|X*  
M)13'B
.  
Questions: , ['}9:f9  
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per s|IBX0^@  
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? Zo UeLU  
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese TX)W.2u=  
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer?  O_ _s~  
$(}rTm  
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B #-|fdcb  
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity bQD8#Ml1  
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between x'EEmjJ  
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked l
a;*>  
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter loA/d  
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. e&sH<hWR  
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on $9%F1:u  
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the 7 U7!'xU  
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was R_!'=0}V  
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a 9!AvsC9  
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of l/3=o}8q  
China and international practice 2G.y.#W  
P'wo+Tn*  
Questions: &G2&OFAr]q  
1)What is the main issue in this case? 4?Y7.:x  
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve 1;[KBYUH  
the dispute?

南京大学1997国际经济法试题 Q z(n41@`  
一.名词解释 uxyj6(  
国家豁免原则.互惠原则.国际贸易术语解释通则.共同海损.关税税则.关税配额.GATS. * WV=Xp  
权责发生制 R?u(aY)P  
二.论述题 xO_>%F^?  
1.简要说明中国公司与美国公司之间的国际货物买卖关系要受到哪些法律的调整 *rTg>)  
2.简述进口许可证制的作用与特点,并具体说明,在我国是否所有的商品的进口都需要经过许可 dnomnY(*<  
3.什么是国际投资中的投资措施,各国对此都规定了哪些相关的国际税则 x^@oY5}cr  
4.试述国际投资中合营企业的概念,类型与特点.并简要说明中外合资经营企业与中外合作经营企业的主要区别 _<RTe s  
三.案例分析 VwH|ed$  
1.中国与加拿大都是<联合国货物销售合同公约>的缔约国.中国某轻工业开发公司与加拿 mhVLlbY|t  
大某公司签定了一份关于买卖3台新闻纸机的合同,总价款约300万美元,合同签定后.加拿 0GxJja  
大某公司一直不交货,该开发公司就从其他来源购买了相同规格的新闻纸机作为替代物, |&"aZ!Kn  
但买入价比合同规定的价格高出50%,该开发公司要求加拿大某公司赔偿这50%的差价损失 fV4rVy8  
,请回答: S3/%;=|  
1)中国公司是否有权撤消原合同而购买替代物?为什么? MrzD ah9UG  
2)中国公司的损害赔偿要求是否合理?为什么? T/E=?kBR  
2.中国某土产公司对新加坡出口红枣一批,国外开来的信用证规定为三级品质,交货时,中 y?a71b8m  
方公司因库存三级红枣缺货,就改装二级货,并在商业发票上注明:二级红枣,价格照旧,仍 Uj ;JN}k  
按原定的三级货价什收,中方公司原以为所交货物品级较原定的为高，而价格不变,对方 KANR=G  
公司不会有异议.但是,买方在收到上述单据后,声称该货系作转售他人之用,因而无法接受中方所交的二级货,还认为中方公司未按合同规定交 T+nID@"36  
货,因而提出索赔要求. -y|J_;EG  
请回答:1)对方公司是否有权拒收货物并提出索赔要求?为什么？ r|UJJ9i  
2)中方公司能否从对方开证行收到货款?为什么?

南京大学1998国际经济法试题 kyAN O  
一.名词解释: |gI>Sp%Fu  
市场准入.LSLP.外汇倾销.国家契约.Law-making Treaty.Sovereign Immunity.Letter uQvTir*e  
of Credit ^}Vc|
|S  
二.论述题 5N ZuaN  
1.试述限制性商业条款的性质,并说明我们对其应持的态度 Axsezr/  
2.何谓税收饶让抵免,税收饶让抵免和一般的外国税收抵免有哪些区别 GP c B(  
3.说明国际公法,国际私法与国际经济法的关系 ~\JB)ca.  
4.简述外商投资企业的注册资本与投资总额的法律含义及两者之间的关系 t$nJmfzm  
三。案例题 nrKAK^  
1.中国某公司(买方)与外国某公司签定了一批进口一批钢材的买卖合同.按合同规定,货 e-y$&[  
物分两批装运,支付方式为不可撤消的即期信用证.经买方申请,信用证有中国的银行开立 T
;(,9>Qsu  
,每批货分别开立一份信用证,第一批货物装运后,卖方在有效期内向银行交单议付,议付 sPi  
行审单后,即向该商*议付货款.随后开证行对议付行作了偿付.买方在收到第一批货物后 b5)^g+8)w  
.发现货物品质与合同不符,因而要求开证行对第二批信用证项下的单据拒付款.请根据信 dP_QkO  
用证的法律关系及性质来回答: } d}gb`Du  
1)你认为开证行能否拒绝付款,为什么 <@(\z   
2)如果买方的要求遭到开证行的拒绝,你认为买方应采取何种措施? LRHod1}mS  
*该商即外国某公司 E7/UsUV.  
0]7jb_n1  
2In April 1986,X,a Chinesee Radio Component Factory signed a contract in Beij VYb,Hmm>kC  
ing with Y,a US company for a capaciton production line worth 17 million yuan. S|tA%2z  
The equipment was to have been delivered before April 30,1987.but it did not ,JdBVt  
arrive even by September that year.The contract set out a penalty of one per n)X%&_  
cent of the line value as compensation if the equipment was one to nine weeks k_}$d{X  
overdue.Another agreement was signed by the two parties in Octorber 1987 and A[m?^vk q  
stipulated delivery by the end of December 1987,but it did not specify claims. tZ[9qms^_  
The equipment finally arrived in March 1988 i.e. eleven months late.Inspection o(e(|k {  
shows that 30 of the 113 imported pieces equipment were found to be second hand h81giY]  
.Some were useless.The defect caused losses of 2.44 million yuan.Supplementary zqj|$YNC  
agreement signed in May required the US company to replace the defective par-  dHx4yFS  
ts of equipment before the end of October 1988.But to-date,none has arrived. >oq\`E  
All this caused X,thefactory in Beijing a total loss of 3.7 million yuan.X t ]mtiIu[  
hen filed a suit against Y in the people's Court for compensation of all the eg*aVb  
losses. Pxf>=kY  
Qestions: b)IQa,enH  
1)Sice Y is an absent defendant residing outside the Chinese territory,in view of the principle"the plaintiff follows the forum of the defendant"incorporated in Chinese procedure law,does the People's Court have jurisdiction over such a &w^9# L  
case ?Why? O8#]7\)  
2)What is the proper law lf the contract to be applied the People'Court,as there is no express choice of law provision in the contract?And why ?

南京大学1999国际经济法试题 _}47U7s8  
一.名词解释 XS2/U<sd  
根本违反合同.风险转移.国际投资法.TRIMS.国家契约.投资总额.国际货币 ]lKUpsQI  
二.论述题 J;XO1}9  
1.试述涉外经济法与国际经济法的关系 0 J"g "=  
2.简述外商投资股份有限公司的基本含义与法律特征 b'^<0c  
3.简要说明信用证的定义,依据及法律关系 W"s/8;  
4.何谓国际技术贸易中的限制性条款,其法律地位如何 ?i0u)<H  
三。案例题 PSAEW.L  
1.我国某出口公司A(以下简称"中国A公司")按CIF合同条件向欧洲某国进口商B(以下简称 -}xK> ["  
"外国B公司")出口一批草编制品,并向中国人保公司投保了一切险,同时规定以信用证的 MA9E??p3\  
方式支付.中国A公司在合同规定的期限和指定的中国某港口装船完毕,取得了船公司签发 z+oy#p6+F.  
的提单,然后去中国银行议付了款项.几天后,中国A公司接到外国B公司来电,来电称:因装 _)pOkS  
货海轮在运输途中失火,草编制品全部被烧毁,外国B公司要求中国A公司向中国人保公司 fif 'ptK  
提出索赔,否则要求中国A公司退出全部货款.请回答: PfYeV/M|  
1)何谓CIF合同条件 (5`(
H.(  
2)对外国B公司的要求.中国A公司应如何处理.为什么 }t(5n$go6  
2.新加坡A商行于5月10日来电向中国B公司发盘出售木材一批.发盘中列明各项必要条件 Cs"ivET  
.但未规定有效期.B公司于当天收到来电,经研究后,5月12日上午11时向当地电报局交发 n=DmdQ}  
对以上发盘表示接受的电报.该电报于同日下午2时送达新加坡A商行.在此期间,因木材价 ZX-A}  
格上涨,新加坡A商行于5月12日上午8时20分向当地电报局交发电报,电文如下:"由于木材 &N7q9t  
价格上涨,我方5月10日来电发盘撤消."该电报于同日上午11点20分送达中国B公司,试问: qldm"Ul  
1)根据有关国际贸易的法律，新加坡A商行是否已成功的撤消了5月10日的发盘.为什么 Qg1kF^=  
2)新加坡A商行与中国B公司之间是否已成立了合同,为什么

南京大学2000国际经济法试题 @~=d4Wj6  
一.名词解释 yHf^6|$8  
TRIMS.投资保护协定.外商投资股份有限公司.股权式合营企业."根本违反合同" ,{ 0&NX  
适航责任.国际许可证协议.替代国制度 }#Ji"e  
二.论述题 UY *Z`$  
1.根据我国法律规定,简要说明外商投资企业在我国取得土地使用权的主要方式及其不用特点 _Nz?fJ:$@  
2.简述国际货币基金组织的法律地位和国际货币基金协定的基本原则 !*qQ7  
3.<1990年国际贸易术语解释通则>的主要特点是什么 z6qx9x|Ij  
4.试述关税在GATT中的法律地位 #8vl2qWbi  
三。案例题 ~}D"8[ABj  
INTRODUCTION FgP{  
Aswer in Chinese the following questions after you read the cases.You must a 5 r<cna  
nswer them precisely to the point.Put forward the various basic principles o 9,>c;7s X  
f the laws to support your argument. ?ODBW/{[G  
bV)h\:oC  
Case 1 Cw.DLg  
In June 1990, a Chinese trading company concluded a joint venture contract w >6(e6/C-9  
ith a foreign industrial company.Under the contract,the two parties woukd mak vHymSU/J  
e joint investment to establish Grant Hotel of New Century with the ,0,& L  
total investment of USDTen million and registered capital of USD five milli 4kNSF  
on.Each party must contribute 50% of registered capital. Hs.5@l  
After the approval of joint venture contract,the Chinese party performed the M~saYJio  
obligation of contributing capital.However,the foreign side failed to contr :G<~x8]k0  
ibute any capital by the end of December.When the construction of major buil *ES"^N/88  
ding of hotel was completed in Augest 1991,the foreign party remained failur Es:o XA  
e to contribute capital,which resulted in the great loss of the Chinese canc 6se[>'5  
ellation of the joint venture contract.At the same time,the Chinese side sugb n3hlo@gYW  
mitted the disp 5.Nc6$ N  
ute to the arbitration body in Beijing according to the arbitration clause i 3SF J8  
n the contract,claiming for damages from the foreign side. 3=lQZi<]%  
Question: te3\MSv;O  
1)Did the Chinese company have the right to cancel the joint venture contrac 7I@@} A  
t/Why? hy
a $Vp  
2)How to deal with the dispute concerning the loss or damage?(Suppose you we s(Fxi|v;  
re an arbitrator of the arbitration body,please give your opinion to the cas WWIQ6EJO  
e) H#I%6k*\a  
aD?ySc}  
/5R?(-  
Case 2 ='.G,aJ9  
A Chinese company and a Hong Kong company reached a joint venture agreement ]K>x:vMKH  
to establish a hotel at the end of 1989 in China.The total investment contri N07FU\<9  
buted ty the two parties equaled $2 million and each party ,respectively,sha `SESj)W(y  
red 50% equity of the joint venture,In July 1990,the Hong Kong company declar 9Or  
ed bankruptcy in Hong Kong.Later,the Hong Kong c [/eRc  
ompany entered into a new agreement with the third party for assignment(tran ]0@ J)Z09  
sferring)of its equity of the joint venture to the latter so as to repay a d [YQ` `  
ebt from the assignment.The assignment agreement was submitted to the local -*"Q-GO  
government for approval.Having discovered what had happened,the Chinese comp 2/G`ej!*  
any requested the Hong Kong company to cancel the assignment agreement and pr ,~xX[uB  
oposed to receive the Hong Kong party's equity in the same conditions. -MH~1Tw6Z  
After such request and proposal were refused by the Hong Kong company,the Ch S"joXmJ/-C  
inese company filed a lawsuit against the Hong Kong company. y@Ga9bI7  
Questions: yB xWBW*e  
1)Was the said assignment agreement effective under Chinese law?Why? 73d7'Fw  
2)What was the right of the Chinese party in the matter of Hong Kong party's G~Mxh,aD$>  
equity assignment under Chinese law?