一.名词解释 S=,1}
XZ
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. l;*l PRoW,
注册资本 ^-GX&ODa
二.论述题 9*;isMkq<
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 $|(|Qzi%
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 M/a/H=J
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 W 8$=a
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 )O@ ^H
三.案例题(中文回答) \'+{X(]
INTRODUCTION T[h}A"yK;
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must R}w wC[{
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles #A/J^Ko
of international trade law to support your argument $Kz\
h#}
LnTe_Q7_
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American qH%L"J
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD .8qzU47E
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese 92aDHECo
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market K-5"#
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed Ag#5.,B
-
back an acceptance. "aWX:WL&}s
,rFLpQl
Questions: K;y\[2;}e,
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per ~I \r1Wj;
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? t6bWSz0
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese I"cQ 5gF?A
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? 1s} ``1>
bOxjm`B<
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B |T$a+lHMD
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity U.pr} hq
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between W}R =
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked Nx 4DC
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter &FJU%tFA
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. P96Cw~<Q?
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on y13CR2t6
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the !QQ<Ai!E
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was yA !3XUi
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a 1(:b{Bl
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of p9&gEW
China and international practice d EQReD
Gh$y#0qr
Questions: c<+g|@A#
1)What is the main issue in this case? *C3uMiz
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve ,<;l"v(
the dispute?
