一.名词解释 C$C>RYE?.
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. s]kzXzR
C?
注册资本 4J(-~
二.论述题 Kj3Gm>B<y
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 ao .vB']T
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 k%O3\q
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 I''n1v?N
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 Z^4+ 88
三.案例题(中文回答) Tl[*(|/C
INTRODUCTION cVxO\M
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must v_
/<f&r
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles 4L{]!dox
of international trade law to support your argument L1(-xNUo_i
C8Mx>6
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American fvi0gE@bd
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD Y[}A4`
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese q<z8P;oP^
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market Y0EX{oxt1
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed G?XA",AC
back an acceptance. 6g"h}p\{S
0hGmOUO
Questions: g%[:wjV;
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per dc1Zh
W4
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? BQg3+w:>
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese H7;,Kr
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? 7t<MHdw
?#Z4Dg
9|
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B wi
jO2F
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity KZZ Y9
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between ~XuV:K3
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked `\\s%}vZ*T
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter $^{#hYq)o
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. rEj[XK
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on YMK ![ q-
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the {xov8M
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was 7f ub^'_
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a F
ibZT1-k
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of V8B4e4F
China and international practice kln)7SzPuk
>|kD(}Axf
Questions: ,z/aT6M?H
1)What is the main issue in this case? v7./u4S|V
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve wDW%v@
the dispute?