一.名词解释 ](@Tbm8
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. _CBG?
注册资本 +hRAU@RA
二.论述题 Y dmYE$
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 ;dNKe.`Dg
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 Je[wGF:%:$
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 -S
OP8G
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 E=3<F_3W
三.案例题(中文回答) {xp/1?Mo*
INTRODUCTION (qnzz!s
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must KQj5o>} 6
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles x-+Hy\^@|
of international trade law to support your argument (2Z-NVU#
c%yhODq/
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American VChNDHiH
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD +ZEj(fd
9
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese HP^<2?K
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market /\V
-1 7-
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed O{uc
h
back an acceptance. p?2\9C4
*Fb]lM7D
Questions: bf|s=,D
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per t23uQR#>b_
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? //n$#c_}u
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese s4/4o_[W
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? z'Atw"kA
tAO,s ZW
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B ]KdSwIbi
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity mZQW>A]iE
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between byoP1F%
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked Jw3VWc
]]
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter ]-h;gN
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. lZ|+.T!g?
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on r#r L~Rsd}
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the P0VXHE1p
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was Wu3or"lcw*
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a p5`iq~e9
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of @yp#k>
China and international practice @oE^(
x7\b-EC
Questions: >-U'mkIH
1)What is the main issue in this case? \PReQ|[ah
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve $eHYy,,
the dispute?