2008中科院英语翻译全文

2008中科院英语翻译全文 <5~} !N X`  
4PEJ}BW  
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher zTP3JOe(  
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has !_cT_ WHty  
violated the ethical standards of the research ?zNv7Bj  
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but -~ `5kO~  
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable Tp`by 1s  
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, 928szUo:  
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own e GblQGRS  
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, quU%9m \S`  
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists M*E4:A9_M  
and their institutions, result in the imposition of +MeEy{;  
counterproductive regulations, and shake public pWB)N7x&  
confidence in the integrity of science. xk}YeNVj  
h8O[xca/~  
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is &S<tX ]v
 
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is ~^IS{
1  
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person d"nE+pgE  
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past X1i6CEa<  
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of JMOQDo  
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be 7Z"mVh}  
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can SA{A E9y  
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the j46fQ  
charge, the institutions involved, and science in GOa
](oD}  
general. o 1#XM/Z  
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research +vLuzM-  
ethics usually has more options than are immediately 7 4aap2^  
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to )AqM?FE4R  
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. OsAXHjX}  
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, .F?yt5{5No  
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of T2}I,{U  
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a lyIstfRh15  
complaint. 7J,W#Ql)5  
hn.9j"  
An important consideration is deciding when to put a N*lq)@smq  
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are pt(GpbtWK  
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal Yiu)0\ o  
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint )dJ M  
in writing can have serious consequences for the career <hdR:k@#  
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after A8
6#7  
thorough consideration. NV*aHci  
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Zx55mSfx:  
Service require all research institutions that receive h^~eTi;c]Q  
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with )(\5Wk9(  
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take QXq~e  
into account fairness for the accused, protection for 6}x^T)R  
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and e1}h|HLj  
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. v=i[s  
Trbgg  
In addition, many universities and other research REoFP;H~  
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics z.]t_`KuF9  
officer, or other official who is available to discuss ]J;^< 4l  
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions #g{ZfO[ #  
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever }.o rfW  
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry
U&w Ve$  
points, so that complainants can go to a person with 6g@j,iFy  
whom they feel comfortable. n9t8RcJS:  
9j:?s;B  
[*vk&  
1、广义地说，即使是一个不轨行为，也能中伤科学家和他们的单位，导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行，并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 lp!@uoN^T  
2、如果处理不当，一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 &Zd{ElM  
3、在大多数情况下，最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里，指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师，在决定是否提出投诉时，能提供宝贵的意见 2ztP'  
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果，只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 ,Ztj  
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。

dsf vfgtdfh

十分感谢楼主

感谢搂主，我还没有考试，可以借鉴一下中科院的经验文字

有没有其他部分的答案啊？

学习中

这么快就上网了，超牛！ 9]<p  
对比一下，能得个8-9分吧，这部分当时就晕了，词汇不过关啊！