2008中科院英语翻译全文

2008中科院英语翻译全文 )UA$."~O  
o2e aSG  
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher ^vXMX ^*  
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has 2GNtO!B.  
violated the ethical standards of the research 5)fEs.r0 U  
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but w5 nzS)B:u  
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable ydo"H9NOS  
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, R)% Jr.U  
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own ".jY3<bQg  
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, '@)47]~  
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists UxI0Of&:  
and their institutions, result in the imposition of ?bwF$Ku  
counterproductive regulations, and shake public ]O'dwC  
confidence in the integrity of science. <rd7<@>5D  
CR*R'KX D%  
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is Hn"xn79nc  
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is c e`3&  
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person RD_IGV  
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past d#yb($HAJ  
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of pC 5J '@  
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be 8F|8zX&  
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can smEKQHB  
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the jEr
/*kv  
charge, the institutions involved, and science in =KfV;.&  
general. :A%|'HxH3  
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research B
WdR~|2  
ethics usually has more options than are immediately X2b<_j3  
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to )rJ{}U:S  
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. '@1oM1  
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, .>z)6S_G  
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of s)Bl1\Q  
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a KKm&~^c  
complaint. RRh0G>*  
Y<%)Im6v/  
An important consideration is deciding when to put a 7{HJjH!zx  
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are nO^aZmSu  
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal {qO[93yg)/  
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint ab?   
in writing can have serious consequences for the career {fXD@lhi  
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after 4B>N[#-0=  
thorough consideration. ZdbZ^DUR<(  
The National Science Foundation and Public Health *
^R?*vNs  
Service require all research institutions that receive c@d[HstBJ  
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with rEwEdyK  
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take [DS.@97n  
into account fairness for the accused, protection for tU2 8l.  
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and v'`VyXetl  
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. \9Nd"E[B  
ut8v&i1?  
In addition, many universities and other research C f@~W)K  
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics ,CiN@T \&  
officer, or other official who is available to discuss ,PH;j_  
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions IC&>PwXb  
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever =6FA(R|QU  
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry ^IgxzGD  
points, so that complainants can go to a person with w l c Cz  
whom they feel comfortable. w|$i<OIi)  
;Fw{p{7<  
bgD4;)?5b  
1、广义地说，即使是一个不轨行为，也能中伤科学家和他们的单位，导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行，并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 A")F7F31c  
2、如果处理不当，一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 fBtTJ+51}  
3、在大多数情况下，最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里，指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师，在决定是否提出投诉时，能提供宝贵的意见 e}%~S9\UL5  
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果，只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 -'SpSy'_  
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。

dsf vfgtdfh

十分感谢楼主

感谢搂主，我还没有考试，可以借鉴一下中科院的经验文字

有没有其他部分的答案啊？

学习中

这么快就上网了，超牛！ rnSrkn"j{  
对比一下，能得个8-9分吧，这部分当时就晕了，词汇不过关啊！