南京师范大学考博英语模拟题及其解析 si(cOCj/
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the n8u*JeN
United States by applying new social research findings on the N4wA#\-
experiences of European migrants. In his reinterpretation, migration ,2,5Odrz
becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of "U8S81'
preindustrial North America. His approach rests on four separate J@]k%h
propositions. _kN*e:t
The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England *7RvHHf
moved regularly about their countryside; migrating to the New World h}&b+1{X
was simply a “natural spillover”. Although at first the colonies c!wtf,F
held little positive attraction for the English — they would rather Fo}7hab
have stayed home — by the eighteenth century people increasingly %|+E48
migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of Geng duo W)4QOS&
yuan xiao wan zheng kao bo ying yu zhen ti ji qi jie xi qing lian xi FS@A8Bb
quan guo mian fei zi xun dian hua: si ling ling liu liu ba liu jiu f$F*3
qi ba ,huo jia zi xun qq: qi qi er liu qi ba wu san qi opportunity. LM"y\q ]
Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that used to euQ.ArF
flourish in America history textbooks, there was never a typical New |vu>;*K
World community. For example, the economic and demographic character `.v(fC
of early New England towns varied considerably. p]ivf
Bailyn’s third proposition suggest two general patterns J/ W{/E>;
prevailing among the many thousands of migrants: one group came as vAi$[p*im
indentured servants, another came to acquire land. Surprisingly, ,t,wy37*D
Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the IIz0m3';+
driving forces of transatlantic migration. These colonial \#,t O%D
entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who >M;u*Go`QO
came to preindustrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled KQ`=t
laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers -iN.Iuc{b_
demanded skilled artisans. io%')0p5q
Finally, Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized ^^Jnv{)
hinterland of the European culture system. He is undoubtedly correct A6"Hk0Hf
to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo-American empire. PQ U]l"A
But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, ]axh*J3
`i
as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is %fjuG
true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never .$rC0<G[K
matched that in England. But what of seventeenth-century New England, >e&