Start with the first, volatility. Equity market instability might feed on itself. LXYpP- E
The VIX, which measures the expected volatility implied by the price of options on the S&P 500 index, U%%fKL=S
vaulted from around 15 to above 27 in a matter of days. Some investment strategies are particularly sensitive to it. _)|_KQQu
For example when volatility is low, they allow for a bigger weighting of equities in portfolios. .OhpItn
But when it rises and stays high, some investors are forced to unload some of their holdings—creating yet more volatility. |;xm-
AM4r
Some exchange-traded funds whose value is linked to the VIX saw outflows. \8j 5b+
It is likely that at least some investors have been betting on continued near-dormant volatility. S1jI8 #z}_
The resilience of such strategies could be tested. u.v
5!G
A bigger worry is credit markets and in particular corporate debt, which has soared over the past decade. m] H[$ Q
A sharp rise in borrowing costs would hurt firms that need to roll-over maturing bonds (Hk4~v6pqC
and would also rattle America's huge private-credit markets. 758`lfz=_
The last big global growth scare, in late 2018, caused a panicky sell-off that briefly threatened to become a credit-crunch. 'Br:f _}
So far the interest-rate spread over Treasuries demanded by investors to hold high-yield corporate paper ?O(@B T
has widened to 4.3 percentage points, with much of the impact felt by energy-sector bonds. That is cause for concern, not alarm. GMk\
l
But new issuance has halted—by February 26th Wall Street had gone three days without any high-grade offerings, according to Bloomberg. 5x $/.U
If that continues there will be a corporate liquidity squeeze. LV4\zd6
Interest-rate cuts cannot do much to remedy the disruption. But they can help to soothe credit markets. .II*wK k
Easier policy from the Federal Reserve has in the past—notably in 1998— x"g-ok LN
been fuel for a late-cycle rally in risk assets in the face of formidable headwinds. :~u vxiF
A fortnight ago, just a single interest-rate cut from the Fed was priced in by the markets, eAqSY s!1
says Kit Juckes of Societe Generale, a French bank. Now two are. #Z;6f{yWf
"We may be pricing in a third, if not a fourth, within a few weeks unless there's a dramatic change in the covid-19 news." 8aDSRfv*
首先是波动性。股市的不稳定可能会自食其果。 0*e)_l!
衡量标准普尔500指数期权价格隐含预期波动率的VIX指数 7RXTQ9BS
在几天内从15左右升至27以上。一些投资策略对它特别敏感。 mM`zA%=
例如，当波动性较低时，它们允许在投资组合中赋予股票更大的权重。 T ,' {0q
但当它上升并保持在高位时，一些投资者被迫抛售他们持有的一些股票，这就造成了更大的波动。 2T3TD%
一些价值与VIX挂钩的交易所交易基金出现了资金外流。 ZD$W>'m{F
至少有一些投资者可能一直押注持续接近隐匿的波动性。 T >pz/7gb
这些策略的弹性是可以检验的。 $? 'JePC
更令人担忧的是信贷市场，尤其是过去10年飙升的公司债务。 v?AQ& 'Fk
? |\HYq`!g%7
借贷成本的急剧上升将会伤害那些需要对到期债券进行展期的公司， W UC-* (
同时也会使美国庞大的私人信贷市场陷入混乱。 L&D+0p^lI
上一次全球经济增长恐慌发生在2018年末，当时引发了恐慌性抛售，并一度有演变成信贷紧缩的危险。 U,G!u =+
到目前为止，投资者持有高收益公司债券所需的国债息差 Z`_ `^ \"
已扩大至4.3个百分点，其中大部分影响来自能源板块的债券。这值得担心，但不必恐慌。
24Y8n
根据彭博社报道，新的发行已经停止——到2月26日，华尔街已经三天没有任何高等级债券发行。 /6?A#%hc
如果这种情况持续下去，将出现企业流动性紧缩。 @ve4rc/LI
降息并不能弥补这种混乱。但它们可以帮助稳定信贷市场。 rwZI;t$hf
过去，美联储早期较为宽松的政策——尤其是在1998年—— R1!F mZW8
曾推动风险资产在面临可怕逆风的情况下在晚周期出现反弹。 O?p8Gjf
法国兴业银行的Kit Juckes表示两周前， bHJKX>@{
市场已经消化了美联储一次降息的影响。现在是两次。 ~ RdD6V
“除非关于Covid-19的新闻出现戏剧性变化，否则在几周内， 市场可能不是要消化第四次就是第三次。 KC"#
