2008中科院英语翻译全文

2008中科院英语翻译全文 2!l)%F`  
sBB>O@4  
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher a%V6RyT4qW  
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has evz{@;.R  
violated the ethical standards of the research 4h|sbB"t  
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but #] cO] I  
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable IP9mv`[  
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, Jvgx+{Xu  
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own R:fERj<s  
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, l'y)L@|Qrh  
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists Hj2E-RwG  
and their institutions, result in the imposition of T2Ms/1FH/@  
counterproductive regulations, and shake public W0R<^5_  
confidence in the integrity of science. f#FAi3  
$oD
c   
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is $~W=)f9  
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is 3"!h+dXw  
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person wxS.!9K  
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past Wl\.*^`k  
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of 1P;J%.{  
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be DP_ ]\V<sT  
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can
?d&l_Pa0e  
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the ' d' Dlg  
charge, the institutions involved, and science in }M7{~ov#s  
general. RrA9@95+  
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research X\sOeb:]  
ethics usually has more options than are immediately "T
e[R%aP  
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to 1u>[0<U~E  
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. &|MdBJ   
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, `X)y5*##wq  
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of ^hZZ5(</8P  
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a _Fe%Ek1Yy  
complaint. 1zIX $A  
`-Y8T\  
An important consideration is deciding when to put a V) xwlvX  
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are yrvV<}  
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal aoqG*qh}b  
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint '<=77yDg  
in writing can have serious consequences for the career D*0[7:NSO  
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after p ;]Qxh  
thorough consideration. H^ds<I<)  
The National Science Foundation and Public Health NdxPC~Z+  
Service require all research institutions that receive K]SsEsd  
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with @js`$  
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take V*6
o|#  
into account fairness for the accused, protection for tn38T%  
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and >Py:9~ g,  
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. + *)Kyk  
n:"0mWnL$y  
In addition, many universities and other research `;Od0u
h  
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics e+~@"^|  
officer, or other official who is available to discuss -JfqY?Ue_2  
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions ZHM NG~!  
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever  MFyi#nq  
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry `T,^os#6  
points, so that complainants can go to a person with tP1znJh>y  
whom they feel comfortable. i~"lcgoO  
RF[Uy?es  
O03N$Jq A  
1、广义地说，即使是一个不轨行为，也能中伤科学家和他们的单位，导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行，并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 IOd
du2.(  
2、如果处理不当，一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 ku)/ 8Z`$  
3、在大多数情况下，最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里，指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师，在决定是否提出投诉时，能提供宝贵的意见 )mH(Hx  
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果，只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 Df@b;-E  
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。

这么快就上网了，超牛！ Y,m=&U  
对比一下，能得个8-9分吧，这部分当时就晕了，词汇不过关啊！

学习中

有没有其他部分的答案啊？

感谢搂主，我还没有考试，可以借鉴一下中科院的经验文字

十分感谢楼主

dsf vfgtdfh