2008中科院英语翻译全文

2008中科院英语翻译全文 xId.GWY1  
bN@ l?w  
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher %~S&AE-  
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has WuW^GC{7  
violated the ethical standards of the research po7qmLq  
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but |zE'd!7E  
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable S21,VpW\  
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, dcT80sOC  
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own `y* }lg T  
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, Ti&z1_u  
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists ^G-@06/!  
and their institutions, result in the imposition of W*w3[_"sr  
counterproductive regulations, and shake public ,6W>can  
confidence in the integrity of science. xn|(9#1o  
p
Y$Q  
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is BL58] P84  
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is (_{yB[z>`  
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person =E{`^IT'R  
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past dnuu&Rv  
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of W+1^4::+  
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be FU<Jp3<%  
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can dGTsc/$  
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the '$QB$2~V  
charge, the institutions involved, and science in *k>n<p3dd  
general. sFTy(A/  
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research RY*U"G0#w  
ethics usually has more options than are immediately
f'3$9x  
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to {2"zVt#h  
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. _oDz-  
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, 0 'o:#-  
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of eGbG
w  
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a U|j`e5)  
complaint. ^L&iR0  
ib791  
An important consideration is deciding when to put a wo5   
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are 26x[X.C:  
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal {P#|zp4C{  
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint VTHH&$ZNq  
in writing can have serious consequences for the career 57'4ljvYi  
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after DkAAV9*  
thorough consideration. 0Pi:N{x8  
The National Science Foundation and Public Health .Rf_Cl  
Service require all research institutions that receive }?v )N).kW  
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with >t_6B~x9  
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take r^ ZEImjc  
into account fairness for the accused, protection for .y:U&Rw4  
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and [Cv/{f3]u{  
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. KL Xq\{X  
CF5`-wj/#  
In addition, many universities and other research Z0r?|G0  
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics 'K,:j 388  
officer, or other official who is available to discuss \=0Vi6!Mc  
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions *$ %a:q1U  
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever Gjo`&#  
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry yY&I dE  
points, so that complainants can go to a person with _b;{_g  
whom they feel comfortable. fkNbS  
;q6Ki.D  
fNZ__gO !%  
1、广义地说，即使是一个不轨行为，也能中伤科学家和他们的单位，导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行，并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 (0y~%J  
2、如果处理不当，一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 RF0HjgP  
3、在大多数情况下，最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里，指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师，在决定是否提出投诉时，能提供宝贵的意见 A '];`  
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果，只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 -Wi` G  
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。

这么快就上网了，超牛！ ~|xA4u5LG  
对比一下，能得个8-9分吧，这部分当时就晕了，词汇不过关啊！

学习中

有没有其他部分的答案啊？

感谢搂主，我还没有考试，可以借鉴一下中科院的经验文字

十分感谢楼主

dsf vfgtdfh