2008中科院英语翻译全文

2008中科院英语翻译全文 /s.O3x._'  
XGE:ZVpW  
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher V>}@--$c-r  
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has x2B~1
edf  
violated the ethical standards of the research @-dM'R6C  
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but *0ZL@Kw  
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable T.kmoLlH  
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, 0raVC=[  
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own #~um F%#  
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, %lZ++?&^  
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists loVUB'OSv  
and their institutions, result in the imposition of G5W6P7-<X  
counterproductive regulations, and shake public uN bO
tA  
confidence in the integrity of science. a~YFJAkg9  
& f7{3BK  
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is =jvM$  
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is =T5vu~[J/e  
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person !xoN%5!  
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past v(^{P  
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of _[8xq:G  
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be &fA`Od6l"  
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can xB{
0lI  
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the 4kGA`XhS*  
charge, the institutions involved, and science in P_+S;(QQ~d  
general. f !t2a//  
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ]bO{001y,  
ethics usually has more options than are immediately ay6G1\ 0W  
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to H=]$9ZH!  
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. {\22C `9t  
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, \7Hzj0hSi  
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of :)}iWKAse  
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a jLC,<V*  
complaint. NL&(/72V  
?RGL0`Lg  
An important consideration is deciding when to put a uy\<t  
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are Mj |)KDL  
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal 6}mbj=E`  
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint P(G$@},W  
in writing can have serious consequences for the career ghd~p@4  
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after [P)'LY6F  
thorough consideration. PCnE-$QH  
The National Science Foundation and Public Health ju8tNL,J  
Service require all research institutions that receive ~PaD _W#xP  
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with %@q52ZQ  
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take $s.:wc^  
into account fairness for the accused, protection for T[>h 6d  
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and &H, 5f#  
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. wl^bvHG  
G_zJuE$V  
In addition, many universities and other research O_0|Q@  
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics `,H\j?  
officer, or other official who is available to discuss rklr^ e  
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions x*}j$n(Oa  
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever S%uH*&`  
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry 0z/tceW 'F  
points, so that complainants can go to a person with ;YNN)P%"  
whom they feel comfortable. cyA|6Ltg%  
}!\NdQs  
.Br2^F  
1、广义地说，即使是一个不轨行为，也能中伤科学家和他们的单位，导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行，并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 OGg9e  
2、如果处理不当，一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 67%eAS  
3、在大多数情况下，最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里，指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师，在决定是否提出投诉时，能提供宝贵的意见 [VIdw92  
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果，只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 (7`goi7M  
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。

这么快就上网了，超牛！ Ttn=VX{ \  
对比一下，能得个8-9分吧，这部分当时就晕了，词汇不过关啊！

学习中

有没有其他部分的答案啊？

感谢搂主，我还没有考试，可以借鉴一下中科院的经验文字

十分感谢楼主

dsf vfgtdfh